Do professors know about Course Hero and similar sites?
There are many resources on the internet that will help you in your courses. Some of these sites do have material that students upload from previous years that you can purchase or upload your work and sell it – such as Course Hero. Do professors know about these sites? I would say a good number do, but definitely, not all of them.
The existence of test banks (groups keeping records of all the tests and in some cases answers), course notes from previous years, and the accumulation of information as related to a course is not new. The internet and its all-to-all communication model has just made it a little easier for this information to be archived and searched, and the existence of these types of sites was inevitable. In the future, there might be some legal battles fought out on who owns what in the case of a course, but until then here are some basic ideas.
What do professors think about these sites?
I can’t speak for all professors, but I’m certain that universities and their faculty have a mixed opinion of this type of information being available, and a bigger concern on how it could be used. For example, most professors would agree that using this material in the form of copying would be considered a violation of academic integrity. In other cases, however, this material could be useful for a student to model solutions, answers, or responses that is a goal for a student to achieve. Using material in this way might be fine. So there’s a mixed feeling on this information being available.
Note, there are some course syllabi that strictly state that material from the course is not to be shared. In these instances, uploading that course material is a clear violation that might result in further academic and legal battles that I can’t guess how they might proceed.
The future is active and tailored learning
In my opinion, these types of sites will have less and less impact as we proceed into better higher education. For those courses that are template based and use traditional information transfer that is assessed through basic tests, then these types of sites are a concern. For most of my courses, which are active learning with some student proposed work, these sites offer little benefit when a student has to learn to perform.
In the big picture of a degree, information is always available and is ever more accessible. Information is useless unless it can be used in our ever theme of “doing”. You won’t get a good job or a great career or achieve anything meaningful unless you learn to do. Learning to do is hard, and there is no easy path. Sites like these promise the potential for an easy something, but my guess is they rarely lead to any great achievement – just a way of skipping the work.